Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, actionable workflow with executable commands, templates, tables, and a validation checklist, well-sequenced across five steps. Main gap is progressive disclosure: reference-grade tables could be split into bundled reference files rather than inlined.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient — dense tables (platform specs, camera intents, model picks), templates, and a checklist earn their place without explaining concepts Claude already knows. Not 5 because the full worked example and some repeated guidance could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready bash commands with all flags ('run-social-video.sh --prompt ... --platform instagram --camera drone'), a Director Brief template, storyboard template, and a full worked example covering common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Five clearly sequenced steps (Read Brand Files → Write Post/Storyboard → Craft Seedance Prompt → Generate Reference Images → Generate Video) with an explicit Prompt Quality Checklist validation gate before finalizing. The generation context is not destructive/batch, so the cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections with no nesting; no bundle files exist, so structure is judged on the single file. Not 5 because platform specs, camera reference, and model tables are inlined rather than split into one-level-deep reference files, and referenced scripts are external/unsignaled rather than bundled. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |