Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is appropriately concise and well-structured for a simple single-purpose skill, with a clear input/output contract. Its main weakness is actionability and workflow clarity: it demands verification evidence but provides no concrete execution or validation steps to produce it.
Suggestions
Add a short, concrete procedure for producing verification evidence (e.g., specific commands or checks to run before returning 'done') to raise actionability.
Include an explicit validate-then-report checkpoint step so the workflow shows how verification is performed before a result class is chosen.
Optionally show a minimal example output payload demonstrating the result class plus the evidence fields, making the contract copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is very lean with no concept-explanation padding; it lists only inputs and an output contract, so every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It specifies a concrete output contract (result classes and required evidence fields), but gives no executable commands or concrete procedure for how to execute or gather evidence, leaving key details missing. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Inputs and output are clearly enumerated and the single result-class decision is unambiguous, but the skill demands verification evidence without providing an explicit validate/verify checkpoint sequence, capping clarity at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no external references and is organized into clear Inputs/Output sections, meeting the simple-skill bar for progressive disclosure; no bundle files exist to verify. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |