Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is admirably concise and well-structured for a simple skill, but its actionability and workflow clarity are held back by an unspecified execution method and a missing verification/feedback loop despite a 'verification expectation' input. Adding a short sequenced execution+verification step would materially raise both dimensions.
Suggestions
Add a brief ordered sequence for executing the item (e.g. read task packet -> work within assigned scope -> verify against acceptance criteria -> emit one result class) to improve workflow_clarity.
Make the verification step explicit with a feedback loop (verify evidence against acceptance criteria; if it fails, return 'needs_rework' or 'blocked') since the skill already declares a 'verification expectation' input.
Add one concrete pointer on how execution is performed (e.g. 'run the task packet's specified commands; record files touched and commands run') to move actionability from incomplete guidance toward executable specificity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows — every line (Inputs, Output result classes, report contents) earns its place. This matches the anchor for lean, competence-assuming content; it is not 4 because there are no trimmable over-explanations to point to. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The output contract is concrete (exact result classes 'done'/'blocked'/'needs_rework' and a specific report contents list), but the body gives no method for how to actually execute the work item, leaving key execution details missing. Per the instruction-only scoring note absence of code is not penalized, yet the guidance is incomplete, matching the anchor for some concrete guidance but missing key details rather than the fully actionable level 5. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Although this is a simple single-purpose skill, the body only enumerates Inputs and Output classes with no ordered execution sequence, and the 'verification expectation' input has no described validate/verify checkpoint or feedback loop. This matches the anchor for steps/validation gaps; the simple-skill exception would allow higher only if an unambiguous sequenced action with validation were present, so it is not 4 or 5, and it is above 2 because Inputs/Output provide rough structure. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external references, and is organized into clear 'Inputs' and 'Output' sections, which per the rubric guideline lets a short reference-free skill score 5 on progressive disclosure. It is not lower because the structure is clean and there is no inlined bulk that belongs in a separate file. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |