Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is exemplary in conciseness and actionability with copy-paste commands and only non-obvious domain guidance, but it lacks an explicit validation/verification step for a state-clearing batch operation.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step after running the command (e.g., confirm the targeted agents report cleared/no active context) to satisfy the destructive/batch validation checkpoint.
Clarify how a blocked ('Busy or queued agents') result should be reported and retried, giving a small feedback loop for the batch case.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient: three command forms and a short DSH-specific paragraph of non-obvious domain detail, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Three copy-paste-ready executable commands cover the common cases (clear all, clear one by variable, clear multiple named agents), supplemented by concrete boundary guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | It is a single-command skill, but clearing agent contexts is state-losing and a batch variant (agent1 agent2) exists with no explicit validation/verification checkpoint, so the destructive/batch cap holds workflow clarity at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no external references needed, and well-organized with a clear title and command block; per the simple-skill exception this scores 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |