CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ccb-comm-reply-recover

Diagnose and recover CCB communication and reply delivery stalls. Use when a user reports a missing CCB_REPLY, stuck ask, agent stuck busy/delivering, queued work behind an active job, cancelled/incomplete reply, empty artifact, callback not continuing, duplicate retry after success, or a CCB mailbox/communication backend that appears stuck.

75

Quality

93%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An excellent operational runbook: concise, fully actionable, with explicit validation checkpoints and failure handling for its destructive operations. The only improvement area is progressive disclosure — the incident-class taxonomy and worked example could move to one-level-deep reference files if the skill grows.

Suggestions

If the skill grows, move the incident-class definitions and the worked example pattern into one-level-deep reference files (e.g., references/incidents.md) so SKILL.md stays a lean overview.

Consider compacting the Example Pattern into a short decision sequence, since the repair rules and verification sections already carry most of its information.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is a lean runbook with zero conceptual padding — it never explains what CCB, tmux, or mailboxes are, and every sentence is an operational rule or evidence instruction. This matches the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor, and there is no over-explanation that would justify 4.

5 / 5

Actionability

Fully executable commands with argument placeholders are given for inspection ('ccb trace <id>', 'ccb pend --inbox --detail <agent>', 'ccb doctor logs <agent>') and repair ('ccb cancel <job_id>', 'ccb repair retry <job_id|attempt_id>', 'ccb repair ack <agent_name> [inbound_event_id]'), each with an explicit selection condition, plus a worked example pattern. This matches the 'copy-paste ready commands covering the common cases' anchor.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A numbered 5-step core workflow, a dedicated Verification section requiring re-trace and queue checks after every repair, explicit failure handling ('If cancel fails or reports a blocker, stop'), and Red Lines safety rules. The feedback-loop requirement for destructive operations (cancel/restart) is fully satisfied, matching the score-5 anchor.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are clearly organized with no nested or buried references, and no bundle files exist. However, the ~110-line body inlines the full incident-class taxonomy and repair rules, exceeding the under-50-line threshold where organized sections alone merit a 5; a modest split would help. It is above 3 because nothing is misplaced or hard to navigate.

4 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Description

90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description with an explicit what/when structure and exhaustive natural trigger phrasing. Its only weakness is that the capability statement stays at the level of 'diagnose and recover' rather than naming the concrete repair actions available.

Suggestions

Consider mentioning the concrete repair actions (cancel stale jobs, retry/resubmit via lineage repair, ack stuck callbacks) in the first sentence to lift specificity from 2 named actions to several.

Optionally note the primary commands or evidence sources (trace, queue, pend) briefly so the capability scope is explicit without adding bulk.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names its domain ('CCB communication and reply delivery stalls') with exactly two concrete actions ('Diagnose and recover'), matching the anchor for 1-2 concrete actions that are not comprehensive. It does not rise to 4 because it omits the specific repair operations (cancel, retry, resubmit, ack) the skill actually performs, and it is not 2 since the actions are domain-specific rather than generic.

3 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both 'what' ('Diagnose and recover CCB communication and reply delivery stalls') and 'when' (a full 'Use when a user reports...' clause with concrete trigger phrases), matching the score-5 anchor exactly; voice is consistently third person.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It enumerates comprehensive natural symptom phrasings a user would actually report: 'missing CCB_REPLY, stuck ask, agent stuck busy/delivering, queued work behind an active job, cancelled/incomplete reply, empty artifact, callback not continuing, duplicate retry after success'. This matches the score-5 anchor of full natural-term coverage with variations and synonyms.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It carves out a clear CCB-specific niche with distinct operational triggers (reply delivery, mailbox, callback stalls), making it highly unlikely to fire for an unrelated skill. It matches the score-5 'clear niche with distinct triggers' anchor.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
SeemSeam/claude_codex_bridge
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.