CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ccb-self-recover

Recover CCB agents, panes, mounts, provider contexts, API/provider failures, config reload aftermath, clear operations, and guarded single-agent restarts. Use when the user asks to fix, recover, restart if safe, clear context, reload, remount, or keep work going after provider/API failure.

69

Quality

85%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A lean, highly actionable operations runbook: exact CLI commands, explicit validation-before-mutation checkpoints, and clear failure/stop conditions for destructive operations. Remaining gaps are minor — some repeated enumerations and a lack of worked examples or expected command output for the judgment-heavy steps.

Suggestions

Deduplicate the recurring startup-input enumeration (provider process, model, base URL, environment, profile, command template, role assets, startup context) into a single defined list referenced by both the recovery flow and Supported Actions.

Add one short worked example of expected command output (e.g., a ccb restart response with restart_status and blockers) to ground the judgment-only steps like 'decide whether agents still use stale startup inputs'.

Consider moving fault-injection handling detail into a reference file to keep the SKILL.md overview shorter and enable one-level-deep progressive disclosure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body assumes competence — it never explains what tmux or CCB is — but the long startup-input enumerations ('provider process, model, base URL, environment, provider profile, command template, role assets, or startup context') recur across sections and could be tightened, matching the 'efficient with minor trims' anchor.

4 / 5

Actionability

Concrete copy-paste commands with flags throughout ('ccb ps', 'ccb queue --detail <agent|all>', 'ccb config validate', 'ccb reload --dry-run', 'ccb restart <agent>') plus explicit gates and blocker reporting. Falls just short of 5 because a few judgment-only steps ('Gather evidence without reading secrets', 'Decide whether affected running agents still use stale... state') lack a worked example or expected command output.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A numbered 6-step Recovery Gates checklist and a 9-step provider recovery flow with explicit validation checkpoints ('ccb config validate' then 'ccb reload --dry-run' before 'ccb reload'), stop conditions for busy/pending state, and feedback loops ('If ccb restart returns blocked or failed, report the blockers'). Destructive operations are fully gated, matching the 5 anchor.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized sections (Recovery Gates, Provider/API Recovery, Supported Actions, Handoffs, Red Lines) with no nested references and everything appropriately inline for a single-file runbook. It misses 5 because at ~98 lines with no bundle files it exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill exception; fault-handling and per-command detail could be split into reference files.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description: concrete, comprehensive action enumeration paired with an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause in third-person imperative voice. Its only weaknesses are modest trigger-synonym coverage and minor overlap with sibling CCB skills on generic verbs like 'reload'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Enumerates multiple concrete actions and targets — 'Recover CCB agents, panes, mounts, provider contexts', 'clear operations', 'guarded single-agent restarts' — giving comprehensive coverage of the recovery domain rather than a vague umbrella claim.

5 / 5

Completeness

Both halves are explicit: the 'what' is the concrete recover/clear/restart/reload action list, and the 'when' is an explicit 'Use when...' clause with concrete trigger phrases, exactly matching the 5 anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

'fix, recover, restart if safe, clear context, reload, remount, or keep work going after provider/API failure' are natural user phrases with good coverage, but a few common synonyms and variations are missing, short of the comprehensive synonym-level breadth of the 5 anchor.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The 'CCB' niche is distinct, but generic triggers like 'reload', 'clear context', and 'recover' overlap with closely related sibling skills the body itself names (ccb-config, ccb-self-chain), so it is mostly distinct with minor overlap risk rather than minimal.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
SeemSeam/claude_codex_bridge
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.