Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with exact templates, a complete command, and a well-sequenced classification workflow that includes a schema-validation checkpoint. Its main weaknesses are repeated prohibitions that hurt token efficiency and a monolithic single-file layout that could offload templates and rules into referenced files.
Suggestions
Dedupe the prohibition language: state each 'do not forward / do not reconstruct' rule once and let the Rules section reference it instead of restating it, to tighten conciseness toward 3.
Move the two evidence templates and the Rules list into reference files (e.g., references/intake-template.md, references/rules.md) and link to them one level deep, so progressive_disclosure can reach 3.
Keep a short inline quick-reference of the classify-then-route flow at the top and defer the Codex-vs-Claude submission details to a referenced section to reduce front-loaded tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is operationally dense and does not explain concepts Claude already knows, but it repeats several prohibitions verbatim across sections (e.g., 'do not forward' / 'never forward the status' and the Rules list restating earlier constraints), so not every token earns its place and it lands at the 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor rather than 3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives exact, copy-paste-ready templates ('**Intake Evidence**' / '**Blocked Evidence**' shapes with CCB_REQ_ID and fixed fields) and a complete executable bash command with full flags plus the named Codex tool ccb_frontdesk_ask_planner, matching the 'fully executable; copy-paste ready' anchor; it is an instruction-only skill with concrete guidance, so absence of free-standing code is not penalized. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | It sequences a strict classify-before-acting flow with four explicit branches and a validation checkpoint ('If the schema or validation marker is absent, report a blocker instead of rendering') plus a 'submit exactly once then stop' terminal step, fitting the 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps and feedback loops' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | There are no bundle files and the SKILL.md is well-sectioned (Inputs, Outputs, classification, templates, Rules), but at ~145 lines it exceeds the under-50-line auto-3 threshold and keeps large inline blocks (both evidence templates and the long Rules list) that could be split into referenced files, matching the 'some structure; content that should be separate is inline' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |