Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, well-structured review/gatekeeping workflow with explicit validation checkpoints, concrete verdict formatting, and clear negative boundaries. It respects token budget and assumes Claude's competence throughout.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and directive with no concept explanations Claude already knows; every line (e.g. "Return a parser-stable machine verdict as the first non-empty line") earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete, specific guidance such as the exact verdict strings ("status: pass", "status: rework_required", "status: blocked", "status: non_converged") and specific forbidden commands ("ccb", "ccb_test"); per the scoring notes, absence of code in an instruction-only skill is not penalized when guidance is actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The seven-step sequence includes explicit validation checkpoints ("Missing or mismatched visible identity is blocked", "otherwise report the missing proof") and branching verdicts, matching the anchor for a clear sequence with explicit validation steps. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no external references needed and is well-organized into Workflow and Boundaries sections; per the scoring notes this qualifies for a 3 with just well-organized sections. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |