Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured spec that gives exact field names and literal values with a clear validation/replan gate, assuming Claude's competence throughout. Its main gap is the absence of a full concrete JSON example of the candidate bundle.
Suggestions
Add one complete, copy-paste-ready JSON example of a valid orchestration_bundle_candidate (one-node and multi-node) to close the actionability gap.
Consider moving the detailed field-schema enumeration into a short reference snippet or example so the reply contract is scannable at a glance.
Make the error-recovery loop after replan_required slightly more explicit (what evidence shape to return) to nudge workflow_clarity toward 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence without explaining basic concepts, with every constraint earning its place; a few elaborated 'do not emit X, Y, Z' lists could be trimmed, so it sits just below the lean-and-efficient 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives exact root/selection field names, literal policy values, and a 500-char rationale limit — highly actionable for an instruction-only skill — but lacks a complete copy-paste JSON example of a full candidate, the minor gap that keeps it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The select-route → apply-selection-rules → emit-candidate-or-replan_required flow is clearly sequenced with an explicit validation gate (return replan_required when verification refs lack direct argv commands); minor gaps in explicit error-recovery detail keep it just below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is well-organized into Reply Contract, Adaptive Selection, and Authority Boundary sections with no bundle files (none needed); it is a cohesive single-file contract, sitting at good-structure rather than a 5 that would require well-signaled one-level-deep references. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |