Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, well-structured instruction document: lean prose, concrete do/don't rules, and an explicit reply format for its single purpose. The only notable gap is the absence of a worked example reply and in-file definitions for domain terms like 'CCB commands'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | At ~28 lines, every sentence carries a boundary rule or reply requirement; no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. This matches the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and executable for an instruction-only skill: explicit prohibitions ('Do not run CCB commands', 'Do not release agents, mutate task status...') and a four-item reply structure. It falls short of 5 because no example reply is given and terms like 'CCB commands' and 'task packet' are not defined in-file, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple, single-purpose skill and its single action is unambiguous: when capacity information is needed, reply with semantic evidence only, enumerated in a clear bulleted list. No destructive or batch operations are involved, so no validation cap applies, and the simple-skill exception holds. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files, and the content is cleanly split into 'Provider Boundary' and 'Reply Shape' sections. Per the rubric, a short single-file skill with well-organized sections scores 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |