CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

plan-tree

Maintain a structured planning document tree made of roadmap/status files, implementation status or handoff TODO files, topic notes, decision records, open questions, ideas/inspiration pools, and repository/file-structure hygiene plans. Use when Codex needs to create, reorganize, audit, or update a multi-file plan, design-doc folder, roadmap tree, active implementation-status file, repo cleanup/filesystem plan, ADR/decision log, ideas inbox, or linked planning knowledge base; reconcile Done/In Progress/Next state; resume work from TODO/handoff state; move resolved questions into decisions; promote ideas into formal plan artifacts; or keep plan documents and file-structure planning internally consistent without making this project-specific.

65

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./useful_tools/claude_skills/plan-tree/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

56%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured and actionable with a clear sequenced workflow and validation checklist, but it is noticeably verbose with pervasive cross-section repetition and inlines template content that would benefit from separate reference files. Tightening duplication and externalizing templates would materially improve it.

Suggestions

Consolidate the recurring 'keep active roadmap/handoff files small; move completed history to history/' rule into a single canonical statement instead of restating it across Execution Contract, Scaling, Status Maintenance, Implementation Status, History, and Final Checks.

Move the reusable templates (decision-record shape, implementation-status sections, repository-cleanup sections) into one-level-deep reference files under references/ and link to them, reducing the monolithic SKILL.md to an overview.

Make the Final Checks workflow's error-recovery loop explicit (e.g., 'if a check fails: fix, re-run checks, only proceed when all pass') to lift workflow clarity from a sequenced checklist to a full validate→fix→retry feedback loop.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

At ~366 lines the body is noticeably verbose, restating the same guidance across many sections—e.g., 'keep active files small, move history out' recurs in Execution Contract, Scaling, Status Maintenance, Implementation Status, History, and Final Checks—constituting several padded, redundant sections rather than isolated over-explanation.

2 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete, executable guidance—a document-model tree, suggested filenames, and ready-to-use section templates (decision record, implementation-status, cleanup plan) plus specific thresholds ('under 150 lines', '15-20 files')—with only minor gaps typical of an instruction-only skill.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear 8-step Execution Contract with a Workflow Detail expansion and a Final Checks validation checklist run before replying gives a solid sequenced workflow with checkpoints; error-recovery feedback loops (validate→fix→retry) are only implicit, keeping it just below a 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well-organized, but the skill is a single ~366-line monolith with no bundle/reference files and inlined template material (decision-record, implementation-status, cleanup-plan shapes) that could appropriately live in separate one-level-deep reference files.

3 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong across all dimensions: it states a concrete capability, provides an explicit 'Use when' clause rich with natural trigger terms and synonyms, and carves out a distinct niche with low conflict risk. No changes needed.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions—'create, reorganize, audit, or update', 'reconcile Done/In Progress/Next state', 'resume work from TODO/handoff state', 'move resolved questions into decisions', 'promote ideas into formal plan artifacts'—with comprehensive coverage of the skill's capabilities.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' ('Maintain a structured planning document tree...') and 'when' via a concrete 'Use when Codex needs to...' clause enumerating specific trigger scenarios.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural trigger phrases users would actually say—'multi-file plan', 'design-doc folder', 'roadmap tree', 'implementation-status file', 'repo cleanup/filesystem plan', 'ADR/decision log', 'ideas inbox', 'linked planning knowledge base'—including synonyms like ADR/decision log.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (planning document tree governance) with distinct triggers (ADR/decision log, roadmap tree, ideas inbox) and minimal overlap risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
SeemSeam/claude_codex_bridge
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.