Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An excellent reference-style skill body: concise, actionable, and well-structured with one-level-deep references that all resolve to real files. The only real gap is the absence of explicit validation/testing checkpoints in the build workflow.
Suggestions
Add a brief validation step after implementation (e.g., 'Run `server.listen()` and invoke the tool to confirm it responds; fix schema or handler errors and re-test').
Consider a short 'Verify' subsection so the planning->implement->verify sequence has an explicit checkpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout: no explaining of what MCP is or how libraries work, just framework-specific routing and a single copy-paste code reference; every section earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable TypeScript quick-reference covering tool, resource, and prompt definitions with real imports and a runnable listen() call, plus concrete per-task routing to specific reference files. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear planning-then-implement sequence exists ('Before You Code' -> 'Implementation' -> 'Quick Reference'), but there are no explicit validation or testing checkpoints (e.g., run/listen, verify the tool responds) for the built server. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clean overview body with five well-signaled, one-level-deep reference links (design-and-architecture, tools-and-resources, widgets, response-helpers, resource-templates), each annotated with a 'when to use' trigger; all referenced files exist in ./references/. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |