Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An expert-level operational skill: dense with non-obvious sbshot and repo-specific knowledge, concrete commands and flags, explicit failure modes, and a closing validation checklist. The main gaps are placeholder-style commands without one fully worked example, a workflow sequence that must be assembled from sections, and troubleshooting content that could be split into a reference file.
Suggestions
Add one fully-substituted end-to-end example (e.g., the complete npx capture → diff → tag → export command sequence with a real dev-server URL, run names, and merge-base ref) so the common case is copy-paste ready rather than assembled from placeholder templates.
Consolidate the workflow into a single ordered step list (cover stories → capture baseline at merge-base → capture branch ref → optional noise run → diff → review pairs → tag → export/host → PR link), with the existing sections as detail beneath each step.
Move the environment-specific "Operational traps" (macOS freemem pinning, ImageMagick fonts, worktree i18n hash generation) into a troubleshooting reference file, keeping SKILL.md as the lean overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body never explains concepts Claude already knows (no primer on Storybook, git merge-base, Playwright, or WebP) and every section carries non-obvious, tool- or repo-specific knowledge ("--noise marks a pair flaky when the noise diff does not show it as unchanged", "os.freemem() counts only truly free pages"), so it matches anchor 5's lean, competence-assuming standard. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete commands and flags throughout — "--theme dark,light", "git merge-base origin/main <branch>", "node ./i18-generate-hash.cjs", "viewer.html#/job/diff/<diff>" — but every command is a placeholder template ("capture <storybook> --name-run <ref>") with no single fully-substituted end-to-end example, leaving the minor gap that keeps it below anchor 5's copy-paste-ready standard. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence (stories first → per-ref captures → diff/noise → review pairs → tag → export/host) is recoverable from section order and backed by real checkpoints — the story-count check, the noise floor, and the "Done means" checklist — but it is never consolidated into one explicit ordered procedure, matching anchor 4's clear sequence with minor gaps rather than anchor 5's fully explicit step list. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with clear headers and easy navigation, but the ~100-line body is entirely inline with no bundle files; the "Operational traps" section (macOS freemem sampling, ImageMagick font mapping, worktree i18n hash) is environment troubleshooting that could live in a one-level-deep reference file — anchor 4's "good structure, minor organization gaps". | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |