Content
57%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured install workflow with good progressive disclosure and concrete prop-level guidance, weakened by duplicated content and the absence of an actual renderer code example and an explicit validation feedback loop.
Suggestions
Add one minimal copy-paste renderer code example (e.g. a Vue 3 MarkstreamVirtualTimeline or content-mode snippet) so the 'add a minimal working render example' step is directly executable.
Make the validate step a feedback loop: 'If build/typecheck/test fails, fix the reported issue and re-run before proceeding.'
Deduplicate the streaming-vs-history guidance between Workflow step 4, Default Decisions, and references/scenarios.md by keeping the detail in one place and linking to it.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | It avoids basic-concept padding and stays domain-specific, but the streaming-vs-history and default-decisions material duplicates guidance already in Workflow step 4 and references/scenarios.md, so it could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Props and import paths are concrete (mode="chat", @import '...' layer(components);), but the skill instructs adding a 'minimal working render example' without providing an actual copy-paste code block to do so. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence ends with a validation step, but there is no explicit validate-then-fix-then-retry feedback loop for when the build, typecheck, or test fails. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body points to a real, one-level-deep references/scenarios.md (confirmed present) with a clear signal to read it before dependency choices, plus a doc-targets list for deeper material. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |