Content
65%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is commendably concise and well-structured, but its guidance stays at the directive-checklist level without concrete sample output, and its referenced resource files are missing entirely. Actionability, workflow clarity, and progressive disclosure are all capped at mid-level.
Suggestions
Add at least one fully-worked sample question (with the expected tradeoff and follow-up) so the guidance becomes copy-paste-ready and actionable.
Introduce an explicit validation/verification checkpoint (e.g., 'verify each question contains a tradeoff and a capacity-estimation ask before presenting') to add the feedback loop workflow clarity rewards.
Create the referenced files under references/ (high-availability.md, distributed.md, redis.md, design-pattern.md) or remove the dangling references so progressive disclosure points to real, navigable material.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and token-efficient — a one-line persona, four tight numbered rules, and a brief resource list — with no concept padding and no over-explanation of what Claude already knows, matching the 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete (specific constraint types 'QPS、SLA、一致性级别、成本', a tradeoff example '一致性 vs 延迟', four required explanation areas, and an explicit prohibition), but it provides no sample question or output template, which is a key missing detail for a question-generation skill. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Four numbered steps give a clear sequence, but there are no validation checkpoints or feedback loops, which the top anchor requires; and because this is a multi-step process, the simple-skill exception does not apply. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned (Overview/Instructions/Additional Resources) with one-level, category-signaled references, but the referenced files (high-availability.md, distributed.md, redis.md, design-pattern.md) do not exist in any bundle directory, so navigation is broken and the disclosure is non-functional. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |