Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, highly actionable, and well structured, with concrete tool names, a full parameter table, clear per-scenario defaults, and an explicit polling/error-recovery loop. It is exemplary for an MCP tool-use skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and information-dense with no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows; the parameter table and defaults are all directly actionable, every token earning its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Names exact MCP tools and a complete parameter table with types, defaults, and per-scenario recommended values; instruction-only guidance is fully actionable even without code blocks. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear async sequence (generate → poll returned contract → terminal state → save asset_id) with an explicit error-recovery feedback loop ("warning.code=\"asset_output_unavailable\" → execute warning.recovery") for the batch/async operation. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Self-contained ~70-line skill with no bundle files and clean section structure (Tools, Recommended Defaults, Reference Workflow, Prompting, Output Handling); well organized with no nested references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |