CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

uae-grc

United Arab Emirates Governance, Risk & Compliance advisor — a jurisdiction-first compliance router. In the UAE, WHERE an organization sits determines its law: mainland (Federal PDPL, Decree-Law 45/2021 — executive regulations still pending), DIFC (DP Law No. 5 of 2020 as amended 2025, with a private right of action), ADGM (DP Regulations 2021), CBUAE-licensed financial institutions (consumer-data residency, outsourcing approvals), healthcare (ICT Health Law data localization), and government/CNI (UAE IA Regulation, Cyber Security Council; Dubai ISR, ADHICS). Use for any UAE / Dubai / Abu Dhabi / Emirates compliance question: UAE data protection, DIFC or ADGM privacy, free-zone vs mainland obligations, health-data residency, CBUAE cyber and outsourcing rules, market entry ("expanding to the UAE"), breach notification, gap assessments, and mapping UAE requirements to ISO 27001 / NIST CSF / SOC 2. Trigger for any UAE privacy, cybersecurity, or regulatory question even if no framework is named.

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a model instruction-only skill body: a jurisdiction-first routing workflow with an intake checklist, a decisive applicability matrix, and workflow templates with concrete clocks, fines, and output schemas — while all statutory detail is correctly pushed to six well-labeled reference files. Time-sensitive legal status is explicitly managed with a last-verified date and pending-regulation watch items, and the grading rules ('include even when not asked') make output quality checkable. No changes needed.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is dense with UAE-specific facts Claude cannot be assumed to know (law numbers, in-force dates, fine ranges, 72-hour clocks) and contains no explanation of general concepts. The 'Last verified: 2026-08-15' marker plus 'as of August 2026' qualifiers manages time-sensitive status explicitly rather than leaving stale absolutes; recurrence of the PDPL-pending point across sections is deliberate graded reinforcement in different workflow contexts, not padding. Matches the 5 anchor ('every token earns its place').

5 / 5

Actionability

Fully concrete guidance throughout: exact gap-table schema ('Requirement | Source (article/clause) | Current state | Gap | Evidence needed | Priority'), specific clocks ('ADGM: 72 hours to the Commissioner'), fine ranges ('AED 500k–700k'), approval mechanics ('CBUAE approval + written customer consent'), and case-deciding routing rules ('Confirm the license before citing CBUAE'). Per the rubric's scoring note, absence of code in an instruction-only skill is not penalized when the guidance is this executable — this is the 5 anchor's 'specific examples cover the common cases'.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Three clearly gated steps — 'Intake Gate (always run this first)' with a 6-item checklist, the applicability matrix to be 'delivered before any detail', then workflow selection — with explicit checkpoints and recovery paths: 'ask if not stated; state assumptions if you must proceed' and 'If jurisdiction is unknown, ask — a wrong-regime answer is worse than a clarifying question', plus 'Always identify every applicable channel before drafting the plan'. This is the 5 anchor (explicit validation steps, feedback for error recovery, checklist); no destructive/batch operations exist, so the validation cap does not apply.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The 86-line overview keeps only routing logic and workflow shapes inline, with all six referenced files ('references/jurisdiction-map.md', 'federal-pdpl.md', 'difc-adgm.md', 'cbuae.md', 'health-data.md', 'cyber-ia.md') verified present, one level deep, and each given a one-line scope description in the Reference Files section; workflows point to them contextually ('Load zone detail from references/difc-adgm.md'). This matches the 5 anchor's 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references'.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

An exemplary description: it pairs a clear capability statement ('jurisdiction-first compliance router') with an exhaustive, synonym-rich trigger list covering every way a user might raise a UAE compliance question, including the no-framework-named case. The one trade-off is length — it is dense with statutory citations — but every clause is either a capability marker or a trigger phrase, so nothing reads as padding. No changes needed.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the concrete tasks explicitly — 'jurisdiction-first compliance router', 'gap assessments', 'breach notification', 'market entry ("expanding to the UAE")', 'mapping UAE requirements to ISO 27001 / NIST CSF / SOC 2' — with regime-by-regime coverage (mainland PDPL, DIFC DP Law 5/2020, ADGM DP Regulations 2021, CBUAE, ICT Health Law, IA Regulation). This matches the 5 anchor ('multiple specific concrete actions; comprehensive coverage') rather than 4, since there are no gaps in the action list for the GRC domain; nothing here is the vague abstraction of the 1–2 anchors.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both questions: the what is 'a jurisdiction-first compliance router' with enumerated regimes and tasks, and the when is a dedicated trigger clause — 'Use for any UAE / Dubai / Abu Dhabi / Emirates compliance question: ...' plus 'Trigger for any UAE privacy, cybersecurity, or regulatory question even if no framework is named'. This is the 5 anchor's pattern (clear what AND when with concrete trigger phrases), not 4, because the 'when' is as explicit and enumerated as the 'what'.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural-term coverage with synonyms: 'UAE / Dubai / Abu Dhabi / Emirates', 'data protection', 'DIFC or ADGM privacy', 'free-zone vs mainland obligations', 'health-data residency', 'CBUAE cyber and outsourcing rules', 'breach notification', 'gap assessments'. Every geographic variant a user might name is present, matching the 5 anchor's 'comprehensive coverage of natural terms including synonyms'; the 4 anchor ('a few natural terms missing') understates it.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A single-jurisdiction niche (UAE/Gulf compliance) with distinct geographic and regulator triggers (DIFC, ADGM, CBUAE, ADHICS, DESC); no plausible overlap with another skill's trigger space. Matches the 5 anchor ('clear niche with distinct triggers; minimal conflict risk') — the breadth is within the niche ('any UAE ... regulatory question'), which is the skill's own scope, not generic surface area.

5 / 5

Total

20

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

Sushegaad/Claude-Skills-Governance-Risk-and-Compliance

Path

plugins/uae-grc/skills/uae-grc/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.