Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a model instruction-only skill body: a jurisdiction-first routing workflow with an intake checklist, a decisive applicability matrix, and workflow templates with concrete clocks, fines, and output schemas — while all statutory detail is correctly pushed to six well-labeled reference files. Time-sensitive legal status is explicitly managed with a last-verified date and pending-regulation watch items, and the grading rules ('include even when not asked') make output quality checkable. No changes needed.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with UAE-specific facts Claude cannot be assumed to know (law numbers, in-force dates, fine ranges, 72-hour clocks) and contains no explanation of general concepts. The 'Last verified: 2026-08-15' marker plus 'as of August 2026' qualifiers manages time-sensitive status explicitly rather than leaving stale absolutes; recurrence of the PDPL-pending point across sections is deliberate graded reinforcement in different workflow contexts, not padding. Matches the 5 anchor ('every token earns its place'). | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully concrete guidance throughout: exact gap-table schema ('Requirement | Source (article/clause) | Current state | Gap | Evidence needed | Priority'), specific clocks ('ADGM: 72 hours to the Commissioner'), fine ranges ('AED 500k–700k'), approval mechanics ('CBUAE approval + written customer consent'), and case-deciding routing rules ('Confirm the license before citing CBUAE'). Per the rubric's scoring note, absence of code in an instruction-only skill is not penalized when the guidance is this executable — this is the 5 anchor's 'specific examples cover the common cases'. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Three clearly gated steps — 'Intake Gate (always run this first)' with a 6-item checklist, the applicability matrix to be 'delivered before any detail', then workflow selection — with explicit checkpoints and recovery paths: 'ask if not stated; state assumptions if you must proceed' and 'If jurisdiction is unknown, ask — a wrong-regime answer is worse than a clarifying question', plus 'Always identify every applicable channel before drafting the plan'. This is the 5 anchor (explicit validation steps, feedback for error recovery, checklist); no destructive/batch operations exist, so the validation cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The 86-line overview keeps only routing logic and workflow shapes inline, with all six referenced files ('references/jurisdiction-map.md', 'federal-pdpl.md', 'difc-adgm.md', 'cbuae.md', 'health-data.md', 'cyber-ia.md') verified present, one level deep, and each given a one-line scope description in the Reference Files section; workflows point to them contextually ('Load zone detail from references/difc-adgm.md'). This matches the 5 anchor's 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references'. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |