aiox-apply-qa-fixes

Apply QA gate findings then hand back for re-review. Never self-approves or closes. Use when: apply QA fixes, remediate gate FAIL/CONCERNS, /apply-qa-fixes.

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a lean, well-structured instruction skill with a concrete sequenced protocol, explicit validation/re-verification, and clean one-level reference to the task file. It matches the rubric's simple-skill guidance where workflow clarity and progressive disclosure can score 3.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is extremely lean with no concept explanation Claude already knows; every line (Task SOT, Input, Protocol, Forbidden) earns its place, matching the lean level-3 anchor.	3 / 3
Actionability	Provides concrete executable commands ("npm run lint && npm run typecheck && npm test"), exact paths, and explicit resolution states (FIXED \| WON'T_FIX \| DEFERRED) rather than vague direction.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	A clearly sequenced 7-step protocol with an explicit validation re-run step and a post-phase verification checklist plus a Forbidden guardrail, satisfying the level-3 anchor for feedback loops.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	Well-organized sections under 50 lines with a single, clearly signaled one-level-deep reference (apply-qa-fixes.md) for the detailed task logic; no nested reference chains.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise, third-person, and clearly answers both what the skill does and when to use it, with concrete actions and a distinct, low-conflict niche. It is a strong example matching the rubric's good_overall_examples.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists multiple concrete actions — "Apply QA gate findings", "hand back for re-review", "Never self-approves or closes" — rather than vague language, matching the level-3 anchor.	3 / 3
Completeness	Explicitly states both what it does (apply findings, hand back, never self-approve) and when to use it via the explicit "Use when" clause, satisfying the level-3 anchor.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	The "Use when" clause supplies natural trigger phrasings a user would say ("apply QA fixes", "remediate gate FAIL/CONCERNS", "/apply-qa-fixes"), giving good coverage; not penalized to 2 because common variations are present.	3 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The QA-gate-remediation niche with the "hand back for re-review" / "never self-approves" constraint is a clear, distinct trigger unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
metadata_version	'metadata.version' is missing	Warning
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: SynkraAI/aiox-core
Path: .grok/skills/aiox-apply-qa-fixes/SKILL.md
Commit: 0b32b68

Reviewed: about 15 hours ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.