Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exceptionally lean, well-structured skill body with a sequenced protocol, explicit validation, and a verification checklist. The only soft spot is actionability, since the primary fix logic lives in a delegated task file rather than inline.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Roughly 40 lines with zero padding; it assumes Claude's competence and never explains what QA or gates are — every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands ('npm run lint && npm run typecheck && npm test'), explicit triage categories, and file paths, but step 1 delegates the core work to an external task file rather than inlining it. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint (step 5 re-runs gates) and a Post-phase verification checklist with feedback for re-review hand-back. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A lean overview under 50 lines, well-sectioned, that points one level deep to apply-qa-fixes.md as the source of truth; with no bundle files present, the simple-skill organization is clean and navigable. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |