Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured single-purpose skill body that gives executable commands and a commit-message template without padding. The main gap is the missing explicit `git commit` invocation and a post-commit verification/feedback step.
Suggestions
Show the actual commit command, e.g. `git commit -m "feat: ... [Story X.Y]"`, so the guidance is fully copy-paste ready.
Add an explicit verification checkpoint after committing (e.g. run `git log -1` / `git status` to confirm the commit landed and nothing unintended remains) to close the workflow-clarity validation gap.
Specify how to stage (e.g. `git add <relevant files>` with a note to avoid `git add .`) instead of the vague 'Stage only relevant files'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean throughout: no explanation of what a commit is, no padding, and every line is either a command, a template, or a guardrail, assuming Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete commands (`git status`, `git diff`, `git diff --staged`) and a copy-ready conventional-commit template are provided, but the actual `git commit -m ...` invocation is not shown and 'Stage only relevant files' lacks a specific `git add` command, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered sequence (inspect -> stage -> commit -> do-not-push) with step 1 acting as a pre-commit review checkpoint and a Forbidden guardrail section; it lacks an explicit post-commit verification or error-recovery feedback loop, so it sits below the validation-with-feedback-loops anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, with no need for external references, and organized into well-signaled 'Steps' and 'Forbidden' sections, satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |