Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of lean, well-structured instruction for a simple skill: a tight sequenced workflow with explicit guardrails and no padding. The only minor gap is that the literal commit command is implied rather than shown.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean throughout, assumes Claude knows git, and avoids explaining concepts; every line (status/diff, staging rule, message format, no-push guard, Forbidden list) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete commands are given (`git status`, `git diff --staged`) and the conventional-message format is shown as a copyable block, but the actual `git commit -m "..."` command is implied rather than shown and step 2's staging is described abstractly, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step sequence opens with a pre-commit review checkpoint (step 1), and the Forbidden section plus step 4 act as explicit guardrails; as a simple single-purpose skill under 50 lines that is well-organized, it meets the simple-skill exception, and committing locally is neither destructive nor batch so the validation cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed for this under-50-line single-task skill; the content is cleanly split into ## Steps and ## Forbidden sections, satisfying the simple-skill exception for progressive disclosure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |