Content
35%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body functions as an inline dump of a full agent configuration rather than a lean SKILL.md overview: it is verbose, triple-duplicates its command list, and embeds internal implementation scaffolding. User-facing command guidance and a basic workflow are present but diluted, and progressive disclosure is undermined by the monolithic structure and missing bundle files.
Suggestions
Move the complete YAML agent definition (lines 66–330) into a references/ file (e.g. references/agent-definition.yaml) and keep SKILL.md as a lean overview that links to it one level deep, removing the inline dump.
De-duplicate the command list — keep a single canonical command table and drop the redundant YAML 'commands' block and the repeated Quick Commands listing; also strip internal 'Story 11.x/12.x' scaffolding and JS require() snippets that are not PM-persona guidance.
Add an explicit validation/feedback checkpoint to the epic-execution workflow (e.g. validate plan → run a wave → check output → fix → re-validate) and include one short worked example of a PRD/spec so the actionability reaches copy-paste-ready quality.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dominated by a ~265-line inline YAML agent-config dump with internal 'Story 11.2/12.1/12.5' scaffolding and JS require() snippets, plus commands repeated three times (Star Commands table, YAML commands, Quick Commands) — padded with implementation detail Claude does not need to act as a PM persona. | 1 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete star commands with arguments are present ('*create-prd', '*execute-epic {execution-plan-path} [action] [--mode=interactive]', '*research {topic}'), but they are buried in non-actionable config and no worked example of an actual PRD/spec output is shown, so guidance is incomplete rather than copy-paste ready. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered Typical Workflow and Activation Protocol exist, but the activation flow (STEP 1–5 with sub-steps 2.5/3.5) is convoluted and the risky epic-execution path ('wave-based parallel development') lacks an explicit validate→fix→retry checkpoint, capping clarity at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/scripts/assets absent); the core agent definition is a monolithic inline YAML block that should live in a separate file, and the referenced paths (.aiox-core/..., docs/...) are external project locations rather than well-signaled one-level bundle references. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 7 / 12 Passed |