aiox-qa

Test Architect & Quality Advisor (Quinn). Use for comprehensive test architecture review, quality gate decisions, and code improvement. Provides thorough analysis including requirements traceability, risk assessment, and test strategy. Adv... Triggers: qa gate, quality gate, code review, qa, @qa, test strategy, secu...

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a tight, well-structured activation protocol that is mostly copy-paste ready and easy to navigate. Its main gaps are delegated logic (the real review/gate work lives in external files) and the absence of explicit validation checkpoints in the activation workflow.

Suggestions

Add a validation checkpoint after persona load (e.g. confirm '.grok/agents/aiox-qa.md' exists and was read) to make the activation sequence self-checking.

Inline a one-line summary of what '*review' and '*gate' actually do, or link to their definitions, since their behavior currently lives only in external files.

Consider shipping a references/ file documenting the gate verdict format so the skill is self-contained without the .aiox-core source.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and operational — every section (Protocol, Starter commands, Authority snapshot, Non-negotiables) earns its place with no concept explanation or padding, assuming Claude's competence.	5 / 5
Actionability	Provides an executable bash block with exact paths and concrete starter commands ('review', 'gate', '*nfr-assess'); the actual review/gate logic is delegated to external source-of-truth files rather than inlined, leaving minor gaps.	4 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear numbered 7-step activation sequence is present, but it lacks explicit validation checkpoints (e.g. confirming the persona file loaded); acceptable since this is a non-destructive activation rather than a batch/destructive operation.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Well-organized sections with one-level-deep pointers to the source of truth ('.aiox-core/development/agents/qa.md') and a fallback path; no nested references, though no formal references/ bundle ships alongside the skill.	4 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, complete, and trigger-rich, clearly scoping the skill to test-architecture review and quality-gate decisions. Its main weakness is truncation noise ('Adv...', 'secu...') and slight redundancy between the inline triggers and the when-to-use list.

Suggestions

Resolve the truncated tail ('Adv...', 'secu...') so the full description and trigger list render cleanly.

Tighten redundancy between the inline 'Triggers:' list and the separate when-to-use field to avoid duplicated keywords.

Narrow the broad 'code review' trigger or qualify it (e.g. 'qa code review') to reduce overlap with general review skills.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the QA domain and several concrete analysis actions — 'test architecture review, quality gate decisions, and code improvement' plus 'requirements traceability, risk assessment, and test strategy' — giving multiple specific actions with only minor gaps from truncation.	4 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both 'what' ('comprehensive test architecture review, quality gate decisions, and code improvement... requirements traceability, risk assessment, and test strategy') and 'when' via a 'Use for' clause plus a concrete 'Triggers' list.	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Lists natural trigger terms a user would actually say ('qa gate, quality gate, code review, qa, @qa, test strategy, security check, nfr') with good coverage; a few common synonyms are absent.	4 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The QA-gate niche ('qa gate', 'quality gate', 'nfr') is distinct, but 'code review' and 'qa' are broad enough to overlap with related review skills, leaving minor conflict risk.	4 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Validation

87%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

Criteria	Description	Result
metadata_version	'metadata.version' is missing	Warning
frontmatter_unknown_keys	Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata	Warning

	Total	14 / 16 Passed

Repository: SynkraAI/aiox-core
Path: .grok/skills/aiox-qa/SKILL.md
Commit: 4ef6530

Reviewed: 2 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.