CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

aiox-qa

Test Architect & Quality Advisor (Quinn). Use for comprehensive test architecture review, quality gate decisions, and code improvement. Provides thorough analysis including requ...

66

Quality

79%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.codex/skills/aiox-qa/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a compact, well-structured activator document that loads an external persona and lists concrete starter commands with minimal token waste. It could improve by adding explicit verification of the fallback path and richer per-command guidance.

Suggestions

Add a validation/confirmation step in the Activation Protocol (e.g. verify the loaded agent file exists before adopting the persona, and confirm the greeting script ran).

Expand each Starter Command from a one-line gloss to a brief expected-output or scope note so Claude can execute without guessing.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean — section headers plus short imperative lines and a flat command list — with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line earns its place.

5 / 5

Actionability

Gives concrete, executable guidance (specific file paths to load, an exact `node ... generate-greeting.js qa` command, and a command catalog), but the command outputs/behaviors are one-line glosses rather than fully specified steps.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The Activation Protocol is a clearly numbered 4-step sequence with explicit loading and persona-adoption steps; it lacks an explicit validation checkpoint, but the steps are well-defined and the work is advisory/non-destructive so the cap does not apply.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized into clearly signaled sections and points to external artifacts (qa.md agent file, generate-greeting.js, constitution.md) as single-level references, though references are textual paths rather than navigable links and no bundle files exist alongside.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is a strong, third-person statement that clearly covers what the skill does and when to use it, with concrete capability areas. Its main weakness is trigger-term naturalness — the language is somewhat formal and misses the everyday phrasings a user would say.

Suggestions

Add natural user phrasings as triggers, e.g. 'Use when the user asks whether code is ready to merge, wants a test strategy, or needs a quality-gate decision'.

Include a few synonyms / related terms (e.g. 'QA review', 'test coverage analysis', 'release readiness') to broaden trigger matching.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and several concrete actions — 'test architecture review, quality gate decisions, and code improvement' plus 'requirements traceability, risk assessment, and test strategy' — though a couple actions remain somewhat abstract rather than discrete operations.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (analysis, traceability, risk assessment, test strategy) and 'when' ('Use for comprehensive test architecture review, quality gate decisions, and code improvement') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Contains relevant terms like 'test architecture review' and 'quality gate', but lacks the natural phrasings a user would actually say (e.g. 'review my tests', 'is this ready to merge') and offers no synonyms or related artifact names.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The 'Test Architect & Quality Advisor' niche with quality-gate and traceability framing is mostly distinct from generic code-review skills, with only minor overlap risk against a plain reviewer skill.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
SynkraAI/aiox-core
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.