CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

aiox-ux-design-expert

UX/UI Designer & Design System Architect (Uma). Complete design workflow - user research, wireframes, design systems, token extraction, component building, and quality assurance Triggers: UX, UI design, wireframe, design system, accessibility, ux-design-expert, @ux-design-expert, component design. Use when the user...

60

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./.grok/skills/aiox-ux-design-expert/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a compact, well-structured persona-activation protocol with an executable registration block, but it defers the substantive design-work guidance to external files and lacks validation checkpoints in its registration workflow.

Suggestions

Add a verification step after the registration bash block (e.g., cat .aiox/active-agent) to confirm the agent was registered correctly.

Inline minimal executable guidance for at least one core task (e.g., *tokenize or *wireframe) instead of fully deferring to external files.

Clarify what happens when the referenced source-of-truth files are missing, beyond the single fallback note.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, avoiding concept over-explanation, with minor redundancy between the Starter commands and Authority sections that could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

The registration bash block is executable, but the core design tasks (*research, *wireframe, *tokenize, *build) are only named with one-line descriptions and defer all real guidance to external source-of-truth files not in the bundle, leaving key execution details missing.

3 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear 7-step activation sequence is present, but there are no validation checkpoints (e.g., verifying the active-agent files were written) for the file-writing registration steps, capping workflow clarity at 3.

3 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized into clear sections with one-level-deep, clearly signaled references to source-of-truth files, but those referenced files live outside the bundle and cannot be verified, a minor organization gap.

4 / 5

Total

14

/

20

Passed

Description

80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and trigger-rich, clearly communicating a UX/UI design-system niche with comprehensive capability listing. Its main weakness is the truncated "Use when the user..." clause, which leaves the usage guidance slightly incomplete.

Suggestions

Complete the truncated "Use when the user..." clause so the usage trigger is a full, explicit sentence.

Add a few natural synonyms (e.g., prototype, mockup) to broaden trigger coverage.

Tighten the duplicated trigger lists between `description` and `when-to-use` to avoid redundancy.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — "user research, wireframes, design systems, token extraction, component building, and quality assurance" — giving comprehensive coverage of the design workflow, matching the score-5 anchor.

5 / 5

Completeness

A clear "what" (complete design workflow with enumerated capabilities) and explicit trigger guidance via the "Triggers:" list are present, but the "Use when the user..." clause is truncated mid-sentence, so the "when" could be more explicit.

4 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural keyword coverage ("UX, UI design, wireframe, design system, accessibility") plus invocation forms, but a few common synonyms (e.g., prototype, mockup, Figma) are missing, placing it just below comprehensive.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The UX/design-system niche is clear and well-targeted, but shared terms like "accessibility" and "component design" create minor overlap risk with related frontend or a11y skills.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
SynkraAI/aiox-core
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.