Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of lean, token-efficient instruction with a clear sequenced protocol, verification checklist, and explicit boundaries (Forbidden). The main gap is that validation error-recovery is implied rather than explicit, and the external task reference is a bare path rather than a link.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient with no concept-over-explanation; every line (Task SOT, Input, numbered Protocol, verification checklist, Forbidden) earns its place and assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete executable guidance (explicit re-run command 'npm run lint && npm run typecheck && npm test', file-list/QA-results updates, hand-back target), but defers most detail to the external task file rather than providing copy-paste-ready steps inline. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced 7-step protocol with a post-phase verification checklist and explicit feedback signal (re-run gates before handing back); the validation is present but the error-recovery loop ('if lint/typecheck/test fails, fix and re-run') is implicit rather than stated. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file overview with a single clearly-signaled one-level reference (the Task SOT path); no bundle files exist, so structure is appropriate, though the external path reference is textual rather than a navigable link. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |