CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

apply-qa-fixes

Apply QA gate findings then hand back for re-review. Never self-approves or closes. Use when: apply QA fixes, remediate gate FAIL/CONCERNS, /apply-qa-fixes.

76

Quality

95%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

100%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

An exemplar lean skill body: token-efficient, fully actionable, with a clear sequenced workflow, explicit verification checkpoints, and well-organized sections appropriate to a simple single-purpose skill.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean and efficient with no concept padding ('Lean SDC skill', 'Task is source of truth'); it delegates detail to a Task SOT file and every line earns its place, assuming Claude's competence.

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete executable guidance — 'Re-run `npm run lint && npm run typecheck && npm test`', 'Load and execute apply-qa-fixes.md', and a FIXED | WON'T_FIX | DEFERRED decision rule — copy-paste ready.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

A clearly sequenced 7-step protocol with an explicit verification feedback loop (re-run gates in step 5) and a Post-phase verification checklist, matching the anchor for clear sequences with checkpoints.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

A sub-50-line single-purpose skill with well-organized sections and a single clearly-signaled one-level-deep reference (the Task SOT file), which the rubric notes can score 3 for simple skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Description

90%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A concise, third-person description that answers both what and when with explicit triggers and natural keywords. Its only weakness is specificity: it names two core actions rather than enumerating a broader set of concrete capabilities.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names concrete actions ('Apply QA gate findings', 'hand back for re-review', 'Never self-approves or closes') but lists only two actions rather than a comprehensive set of multiple concrete actions, matching the 'names domain and some actions' anchor.

2 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (apply findings, hand back, never self-approve) and 'when' via an explicit 'Use when:' clause with concrete triggers.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Covers natural terms a user would actually say — 'apply QA fixes', 'remediate gate FAIL/CONCERNS', and the '/apply-qa-fixes' command — giving good coverage of common phrasings.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Targets a clear niche — QA gate remediation with an explicit no-self-approve boundary — whose triggers ('remediate gate FAIL/CONCERNS', '/apply-qa-fixes') are unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
SynkraAI/aiox-core
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.