Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-organized instruction-only skill that routes to external Task SOT files with clear one-level references and explicit verification checkpoints. Main limitation is that executable review detail lives in the referenced task files rather than inline, which is appropriate for its design but caps self-contained actionability.
Suggestions
Add a one-line note on what the FAIL feedback loop entails (e.g., the fix list handed to apply-qa-fixes) to push workflow_clarity toward 5.
Consider inlining a minimal gate-file schema or verdict-decision summary so the skill is more self-contained without the external task files.
Make the Post-phase verification checklist explicitly gated (require all boxes before lifecycle transition) to strengthen the validation checkpoint.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean ~49-line body with no over-explanation of concepts Claude knows; every section earns its place and assumes competence, matching the 5-anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete pointers (load qa-gate.md, write gate under docs/qa/gates/, verdict values, status table) but the core review execution is deferred to external Task SOT files rather than self-contained, fitting the 4-anchor with minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Numbered Protocol plus a status-policy table and an explicit Post-phase verification checklist give a clear sequenced workflow with checkpoints; the FAIL-recovery feedback loop is only lightly specified, leaving a minor gap below the 5-anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines and well-organized with clearly signaled one-level-deep references (Primary/Supporting Task SOT, lifecycle rules), so the simple-skill exception applies and content is appropriately split. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |