Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and well-structured as a working reference, but it is a large monolithic file with duplicated policy content across sections and unverifiable time-sensitive statistics. Splitting per-platform and industry rules into referenced files and consolidating the duplicated sections would substantially improve token efficiency and maintainability.
Suggestions
Move each platform's policy checklist (Google, Meta, LinkedIn, TikTok, Reddit) and the industry-specific rules into separate reference files under references/, keeping SKILL.md as an overview with the universal pre-submission workflow and clearly signaled one-level-deep links.
Deduplicate content that appears in multiple sections — Reddit political ads (§6 vs §7), trademark rules (§2 vs §9), and financial/crypto restrictions (§2/§3/§7) — consolidating each topic into a single authoritative location.
Remove or clearly flag volatile, unverifiable details such as appeal success-rate percentages, response times, and dated policy reversals (e.g., 'since 2019, reversed 2023'); replace them with a 'verify against live platform policy' directive, which the description already promises.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient checklist format with no beginner-concept padding, but content is duplicated across sections (Reddit political rules in §6 and §7, trademark rules in §2 and §9, financial restrictions split across §2/§3/§7) and time-sensitive unverifiable stats (appeal 'Success Rate 30-50%', 'since 2019, reversed 2023') are inline rather than isolated, so it could be meaningfully tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully concrete instruction-only guidance: violation/example/fix tables, claim restrictions paired with safe alternatives, step-by-step appeal paths, and a copy-paste pre-launch checklist template covering the common compliance cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The pre-submission workflow sequences universal → platform-specific → industry-specific → APPROVED/BLOCKED result, with the checklist itself acting as a validation checkpoint; minor gaps are the absence of an explicit fix-then-recheck loop after rejections and no guidance on prioritizing conflicting checks. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized and navigable, but this is a ~570-line monolith with zero bundle files — the five per-platform checklists and the industry-specific rules clearly belong in separate reference files, so content that should be separate is inline. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |