Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary instruction-only skill body: lean, well-sequenced, and grounded in concrete tool names, diagnostic rules, and safety gates. Its single weakness is that the threshold-setting deliverable lacks a concrete recipe for how to compute a sane alert threshold.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~30-line body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what CTR/CPA is or why anomaly detection matters; every line instructs ("Judge against variation, not a single day", "Rule out the mundane first"), with no tokens to trim. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete tool commands in backticks (`list_connected_accounts`, `pull_google_ads_performance`, ...), anomaly-to-cause mappings, and specific remedies (pause, budget cut, creative swap) make the guidance mostly executable. The gap: "Recommend alert thresholds" — the skill's core deliverable — offers no concrete method (baseline window, multiplier, percentile) for computing a threshold, so it falls short of fully copy-paste-ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (confirm account → pull baseline and today → find outliers → diagnose → act) with explicit validation checkpoints: "State the period and missing data before calling a change abnormal", "Confirm the cause before recommending action", and "Do not pause on one noisy data point". Checkpoints are explicit rather than merely present, and risky changes are gated behind user approval. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no need for external references (none exist in the bundle), and its well-organized sections satisfy the rubric's simple-skill exception; the bolded **pre-pause-analysis** pointer references a sibling skill, not a broken bundle path. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |