Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-sequenced read-only analysis skill that names the exact tools to call and gives sharp interpretive rules (over-claiming, attribution windows, holdouts). Its main gaps are the absence of call parameters or example outputs and any explicit data-validation step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | At roughly 30 lines, every sentence carries a directive, an exact tool name, or an interpretive rule; it assumes Claude's competence with no padding or explanation of already-known concepts. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Names exact executable tools (`get_attribution`, `get_spend_reconciliation`, `ga4_get_report`, five `pull_*_performance` tools) in a defined order, but gives no parameters, date ranges, or example output formats, leaving minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A numbered 3-step sequence with a pre-flight check ('Confirm the account: `list_connected_accounts`') and an interpretive checkpoint ('State what each source measures before interpreting differences'); however, there is no explicit validation of data completeness or error-recovery loop. The destructive/batch cap does not apply since this is a reads-only skill. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no bundle files needed; the numbered sections plus a Rules section are well-organized, which per the simple-skill guideline earns a 5 without external references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |