Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-sequenced instruction skill: numbered workflow, approval gates, post-apply confirmation, and a scheduled re-check, with concrete decision rules for each time slot. The only weakness is minor genericness around which platform tool to read from and how to check the plan schema.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout — no explanation of what dayparting is, no padding, and every rule earns its place ("Watch for thin cells; a single quiet hour is not a trend"); there is nothing to trim, so it matches the 5 anchor rather than 4. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete tool call ("Confirm the account: `list_connected_accounts`") and precise decision rules ("CPA at or below target want to keep or gain bid"; "spend and clicks but no conversions are candidates to reduce or exclude"), but "the platform performance tool" and "unless the live plan schema supports them" stay generic, leaving minor execution gaps per the 4 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four clearly numbered steps with explicit validation checkpoints at every risky point — "confirm before shipping", "Apply on approval", "confirm after it is applied", and a re-check loop "Re-pull after a couple of weeks to check the pattern held" — so the batch-change validation cap does not bind and it matches the 5 anchor's feedback loop. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with well-organized numbered sections plus a Rules section and no need for external references; the single cross-reference ("see **kill-scale-rules**") is clearly signaled, so per the simple-skill exception this earns a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |