Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an efficient, well-structured, read-only reporting workflow with concrete tool calls, a clear report template, and explicit error-handling rules. It falls just short of top marks on actionability and workflow clarity where specific computations (pacing, projection) and an enumerated step sequence are left implicit, and its cross-references to sibling skills are not clearly signaled.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~25-line body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — every line adds skill-specific guidance (audience framing, exact tool names, report structure, presentation rules) with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | It names concrete tools to call ('list_connected_accounts', the 'pull_*_ads_performance' set, 'get_attribution', 'ga4_get_report'), a five-part report structure, and an example headline sentence; minor gaps remain (pacing/projection computation and date ranges are unspecified), placing it just below fully executable. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear prose sequence is present (confirm account → pull numbers → reconcile attribution → write report) with checkpoints ('Reconcile platform self-reports before quoting a total' and 'If data is missing or a platform is unreconciled, say so plainly'), but the sequence is not explicitly enumerated with validation feedback loops as in the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | For an under-50-line skill with no bundle files, the section organization ('## What an exec report says', '## How to present it', '## Rules') is good; the only gap is that the bold mentions of '**attribution**' and '**report**' are not clearly signaled as links to sibling skills or files, leaving minor navigation ambiguity. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |