Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, highly actionable audit workflow built on exact tool names, explicit UNVERIFIED semantics, and a closing re-verification step. Its only notable gaps are the absence of example invocations or a report template and of section headers delineating the workflow phases.
Suggestions
Add section headers (e.g. '## Gather evidence', '## Compare settings', '## Report') so the workflow phases are scannable at a glance.
Include one short example of the per-campaign report format (field: value lines) so output is consistent across runs.
Show one example tool invocation with arguments for the common case, such as pulling geo-broken-down performance for a single platform.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every sentence is instruction or domain calibration ('A campaign name is not targeting evidence', 'Missing fields mean UNVERIFIED, not worldwide delivery or a passed check', 'These are signals to investigate, not proof of fraud') with zero padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Matches the anchor 'lean and efficient; every token earns its place'. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Names exact tools (`list_connected_accounts`, `get_campaign_plan`, `run_launch_preflight`, five `pull_*_ads_performance` tools, `ga4_get_report`) with conditional rules ('Request geography only when the tool schema supports that breakdown') and an enumerated report spec. Mostly executable with minor gaps — no example invocations or sample report output — matching anchor 4 rather than anchor 5's 'specific examples cover the common cases'. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear ordered sequence (confirm workspace → read campaigns → plan/preflight → compare settings → pull delivery evidence → cross-check GA4 → investigate → report → correct → re-read) with explicit validation ('Re-read settings and delivery after the change'). Not 5 because the sequence is prose rather than an explicit checklist and there is no error-recovery loop beyond the final re-read; not 3 because checkpoints are explicit, not implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A 15-line single-file skill with all content appropriately inlined and no external references needed (no bundle files exist). Minor organization gap — no section headers to separate the workflow phases — so it matches anchor 4 ('good structure; minor organization gaps') rather than the well-organized-sections bar for a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |