CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo
SkillPublic

geo-integrity-audit

Check intended geography against available campaign settings and delivery evidence; identify unverified targeting before launch.

Quality

74%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./packages/claude-directory/skills/geo-integrity-audit/SKILL.md

The canonical home for this skill is geo-integrity-audit in Synter-Media-AI/plugin

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a tight, tool-anchored audit workflow: it names the exact calls for discovery, verification, delivery evidence, and correction, and encodes sharp domain judgment rules (UNVERIFIED semantics, signals-vs-proof framing) with an explicit post-change re-verification loop. Main gaps are minor: implicit rather than gated checkpoints, judgment-left-open anomaly thresholds, and no section headers for scannability.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Every sentence either instructs or supplies domain-specific judgment calibration ("A campaign name is not targeting evidence", "Missing fields mean UNVERIFIED, not worldwide delivery", "signals to investigate, not proof of fraud"); nothing explains concepts Claude already knows, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor. It exceeds the 4 anchor because there is no over-explanation to trim.

5 / 5

Actionability

Concrete tool calls are named for every step (`list_campaigns`, `audit_account_structure`, `pull_meta_ads_performance`, `ga4_get_report`, `run_launch_preflight`) along with a specified per-campaign report structure — mostly executable with minor gaps. It falls short of 5 because the comparison criteria and anomaly thresholds (e.g., what counts as "unusually cheap clicks") are left to judgment.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear ordered sequence runs from workspace confirmation through evidence gathering, anomaly investigation, reporting, correction, and an explicit re-verification loop ("Re-read settings and delivery after the change") with UNVERIFIED semantics acting as a check rule. It is below the 5 anchor because validation checkpoints are implicit in prose rather than explicit gates, and above the 3 anchor because the feedback loop and failure semantics are present.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is ~16 lines with no external files needed, so keeping everything inline is appropriate, and no references exist to bury. It misses the 5 anchor (which for short skills requires well-organized sections) because there are no section headers beyond the H1 to make the flow scannable, and it is well above the 3 anchor since no content belongs in a separate file.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description states a concrete, verifiable purpose in third person with domain-specific vocabulary, but it lacks any explicit "Use when..." trigger clause and omits the most common natural synonyms ("geo", "location") users would say. It is clearly distinguishable from neighboring ad-campaign skills yet reads more like a task definition than a triggerable skill description.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. "Use when preparing to launch campaigns, reviewing geo/location targeting, or investigating out-of-market delivery."

Include natural user synonyms such as "geo", "location targeting", and "countries/regions" so the description matches how users actually phrase the request.

Optionally enumerate the supported evidence sources (Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, Microsoft, Reddit, GA4) to broaden keyword coverage and further reduce conflict with generic campaign-performance skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (campaign geography) and two concrete actions — "Check intended geography against available campaign settings and delivery evidence" and "identify unverified targeting before launch" — which matches the 1-2 concrete actions anchor; coverage is not comprehensive enough for 4, and the actions are far too concrete for 2.

3 / 5

Completeness

The "what" is clear, but there is no "Use when..." clause or equivalent explicit trigger guidance; "before launch" only weakly implies timing, and the rubric caps completeness at 3 in that case. It is well above the vague-what anchor at 2 because the action description is concrete.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Relevant keywords are present ("geography", "targeting", "campaign", "launch"), but the natural phrases ad-ops users actually say — "geo", "location targeting", "countries", "regions" — are missing, matching the some-keywords-with-missing-synonyms anchor rather than the good-coverage anchor at 4.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The geo-integrity verification niche (intended geography vs. settings and delivery evidence, pre-launch) is mostly distinct with clear triggers; minor overlap risk remains with general campaign-launch or campaign-performance skills, keeping it below the minimal-conflict anchor at 5.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository

Synter-Media-AI/plugin

Path

packages/claude-directory/skills/geo-integrity-audit/SKILL.md

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.