Tessl • The management layer for AI agent skills

The body is an exemplar of token efficiency — a lean, well-organized overview that routes to authoritative files and includes one concrete behavioral rule for tool usage. Its main weakness is incomplete actionable coverage: OAuth setup, promised in the description, has no guidance in the body beyond delegating sign-in to quickstart, and the help-response procedure is implicit.

Suggestions

Add one line telling Claude where to direct OAuth/access questions, e.g. 'For OAuth setup questions, point the user to the quickstart skill and the support link.'

Make the response procedure explicit: 'When asked what's available, read the README and summarize; when asked about a tool, check tools/directory-tools.json before answering.'

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The ~15-line body is lean with zero padding: an intro line, a compact workflow list, direct file pointers ("The supported tool directory is `tools/directory-tools.json`"), and links, matching 'Lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence; every token earns its place'. Nothing explains concepts Claude already knows, so it cannot be 4.	5 / 5
Actionability	There is concrete guidance — named skills per workflow, specific file paths ("tools/directory-tools.json", README), and one explicit behavioral rule ("Use only tools available in that directory and the live server schema; report unavailable capabilities plainly") — but key details are missing, notably how to handle OAuth setup questions, which the description promises yet the body delegates entirely to 'quickstart'. This matches 'Some concrete guidance but incomplete' rather than 4's 'minor gaps', since one of the four promised areas has no actionable pointer.	3 / 5
Workflow Clarity	As a simple single-purpose skill the routing structure is clear (sign in via quickstart, verify via connect, per-workflow skill names), but the end-to-end procedure for answering a help request is implicit rather than spelled out, matching 'Clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps'. It is not 5 because the single action is not fully unambiguous — e.g., what to consult first for skill vs. tool vs. OAuth questions is left to inference.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	The skill is under 50 lines, no bundle files exist (no references/, scripts/, or assets/ directories), and the body is well-organized into an intro, workflow list, tool guidance, and links — meeting the simple-skill exception where 'progressive disclosure can score 5 with just well-organized sections'. Detail is appropriately deferred to the README and tool directory rather than inlined.	5 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly states what the skill covers across four enumerated areas, but it uses only one generic action verb and provides no 'Use when...' trigger guidance, leaving both specificity and completeness at moderate levels. Trigger terms are relevant but lack natural user phrasings, and the OAuth setup mention creates some overlap risk with a dedicated setup skill.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when the user asks what this plugin does, what skills or tools are available, or how to set up access.'

Replace the single generic verb 'Explain' with distinct concrete actions per area, e.g. 'List the bundled skills, enumerate supported MCP tools, walk through OAuth setup, and point to support options.'

Anchor the description to the plugin (e.g. mention Synter) so it cannot be confused with other plugins' help or setup skills.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	The description enumerates four topics ("bundled skills, supported MCP tools, OAuth setup, and support options") but relies on a single generic action verb ("Explain"), matching the anchor 'Names domain and 1-2 concrete actions, but not comprehensive'. It does not reach 4 because no distinct concrete actions are listed, and it is above 2 since the domain is named with specific topic coverage.	3 / 5
Completeness	The 'what' is clear (explain skills, tools, OAuth setup, support), but there is no 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which per the judging guidelines caps completeness at 3 ('Has a clear what but when is missing or only weakly implied'). It cannot be 4 without any explicit 'when' guidance.	3 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Terms like "MCP tools", "OAuth setup", and "support options" are phrases a user might plausibly say, matching 'Some relevant keywords but missing common variations or synonyms'. It falls short of 4 because natural user phrasings like 'help', 'what can this plugin do', or 'sign in' are absent, and it is above 2 since the keywords present are relevant rather than generic filler.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	As a plugin help/overview skill it has a recognizable niche, but "OAuth setup" could overlap with a dedicated quickstart/setup skill (the body delegates sign-in to quickstart), matching 'Somewhat specific but could still overlap with similar skills'. It is not 4 because no plugin name or qualifier anchors the description to an unambiguous niche.	3 / 5
	Total	12 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: Synter-Media-AI/plugin
Path: skills/help/SKILL.md
Revision: 040ddf8

Reviewed: 18 hours ago

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.

help

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?