Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a compact, high-signal instruction set: concrete tool calls, explicit safety boundaries (never invent a destination; do not claim tracking is installed), a defined deliverable list, and a verification checkpoint before declaring a page live. The main gaps are the absence of worked examples or templates and any error-recovery guidance after verification fails.
Suggestions
Add a short example (sample hero copy snippet or a brief outline skeleton) so the expected output format for the common case is unambiguous.
Add one line of error-recovery guidance, e.g. what to do when the rendered-page verification fails (fix and re-verify before reporting live), to close the feedback loop.
Use section headers (e.g. '## Inputs to verify', '## Deliverables', '## Publishing') instead of four unheaded paragraphs to aid navigation, and confirm the '../../context/brand-and-safety.md' path resolves from the skill's install location.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence — e.g. 'Establish the audience, offer, evidence, and intended conversion before drafting' carries four instructions in one line, and nothing explains concepts Claude already knows. Not a 5 because the mermaid flowchart restates the sequence already implied by the prose, a mild token redundancy. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance throughout: named tool calls ('list_connected_accounts', 'list_creative_assets'), a canonical domain ('https://synterai.com'), and enumerated deliverables ('hero, offer explanation, supporting evidence, objection handling, and primary CTA', 'typography, exact asset references, section order, form destination, and accessibility requirements'). Not a 5: no example copy, no brief template, and no sample output format for the common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence runs verify → establish inputs → draft copy → brief → conditional publish, made explicit by the flowchart, with an explicit validation checkpoint ('Verify the actual rendered page, links, form submission, and tracking before reporting a page live') and a labeled conditional branch on editor availability. Not a 5: there is no feedback loop for what to do when verification fails, and no checklist. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with nothing that should be split into separate files, and its single reference is clearly signaled ('Read [brand and safety guidance](../../context/brand-and-safety.md)'). Not a 5: the body has only a single H1 with no section structure, and the one reference points outside the skill bundle ('../../context/'), which cannot be verified to resolve — a minor navigation gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |