Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A highly actionable, well-structured skill body with concrete operators, schemas, tool calls, and a clear validated workflow including a fake-spiral feedback loop. The only minor weakness is a small amount of restated framing that could be trimmed for maximum conciseness.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense, operational, and avoids textbook padding about what a spiral curriculum is, but a few principles (e.g., the 'revisit != review' framing) get restated across sections and could be tightened slightly, placing it just below the lean 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides fully concrete, platform-executable guidance: named growth operators (ADD_COMPLEXITY, FORMALIZE, etc.), a four-question revisit planning frame, a seven-field Spiral Contract schema, and specific tool calls (create_folder, create_stage, set_roster, generate_scene, generate_actions, generate_tts, read_stage_outline, read_stage, ask_user) covering the common generation cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A two-layer workflow is clearly sequenced with an explicit architecture-confirmation checkpoint (ask_user) before lesson creation, plus a post-completion fake-spiral check with a feedback loop ('hit any item -> revise Spiral Contract -> re-verify'), which is exactly the validation/feedback pattern expected for a batch-generation skill. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; the single-file body is well-organized into clearly headed sections and uses appropriate one-level cross-skill links (/stage-design, /curriculum-planner, /understanding-by-design) for navigation, matching the well-organized top anchor for a self-contained skill. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |