Conciseness

The body is lean and efficient throughout: five one-line cognitive facts, ten rules each with single-line Bad/Good pairs, and no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows (no "what ADHD is" primer). The slight overlap between rule 10's forbidden openers/closers and pre-send items 1-2 is operational reinforcement rather than duplication, since the pre-send checklist adds new nuance (keep hedges carrying real uncertainty, replace idioms literally). Every section earns its place, matching the anchor-5 example rather than the minor-trimming of anchor 4.

Actionability

For an instruction-only skill, absence of code is not penalized when guidance is actionable, and this guidance is fully concrete: every rule pairs a Bad and Good example with real commands, paths, and file:line references ('Run `npm install jsonwebtoken`, then edit `src/auth.ts:42`', 'Test fails at `auth.spec.ts:42`: expected 200, got 401'), and the pre-send check is a runnable five-item verification. Coverage of common cases (multi-step tasks, errors, option requests, destructive actions) is complete, matching anchor 5.

Workflow Clarity

This is a single-task skill (apply the rules to every response) with an unambiguous action, so the simple-skill provision applies: the single action is clear. The pre-send check provides an explicit validation gate with a pass condition ('if the reader reads only the first line and the last line, do they know (a) what to do next, and (b) what just happened? If yes, send'), and 'When to break the rules' serves as override/error-recovery guidance. No destructive or batch operations exist, so the validation cap does not apply.

Progressive Disclosure

Sections are well organized with clear headers (Persistence, What ADHD changes, Rules, When to break the rules, Pre-send check) and easy in-file navigation. However, at roughly 134 lines the file exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill carve-out and is entirely inline with no references or split of content, so it does not meet the anchor-5 pattern of content appropriately split across files. The monolithic structure is justifiable for a style filter that must be fully resident in context, placing it at 4 rather than lower.

Specificity

The description names the domain ("ADHD-friendly output") and one or two concrete roles ("required writing filter by the docs skill", invoking /i-have-adhd), matching the anchor for naming the domain with 1-2 concrete actions but not comprehensive coverage. It does not list several specific capabilities (next-action-first formatting, numbered steps, capped lists), so it falls short of a 4, while being far more concrete than the generic anchor at 2. Voice is third person ("the user invokes"), so no person-penalty applies.

Completeness

Both what and when are explicitly present: the when-clause is highly specific with positive triggers and negative exclusions ("Don't use for marketing copy or after the user says 'stop adhd mode'"), exceeding the anchor-4 example's when. The what is present but thin ("ADHD-friendly output", "required writing filter") without naming what the formatting actually changes, so it falls short of the fully explicit what+when of anchor 5.

Trigger Term Quality

Triggers are natural phrases a user would literally say: "invokes /i-have-adhd", "says they have ADHD", "asks for ADHD-friendly output", plus the deactivation phrases "stop adhd mode" / "normal mode". Good keyword coverage with a few natural terms missing (e.g., "I can't focus", "distracted", "neurodivergent", "executive dysfunction"), which places it at 4 rather than the comprehensive synonym coverage of 5.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (ADHD-shaped output formatting) with distinct triggers: a named slash command, an explicit user statement trigger, and explicit exclusions (marketing copy, stop-phrases) that actively prevent mis-triggering. This matches the anchor for a clear niche with distinct triggers and minimal conflict risk.