Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with concrete commands and well-structured progressive disclosure into verified reference files. Its main weakness is workflow clarity: it presents patterns rather than a sequenced, validated workflow.
Suggestions
Add a short numbered workflow (construct the compatible command -> run with -y -> verify the scaffold/directory was created as expected) with an explicit validation checkpoint.
Include a brief 'verify' step or checklist after the generate command so agents can confirm router-only/blank output matches intent before proceeding.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with mostly earned prose (flag-compat constraints, non-interactive pitfalls) and no padding of basic concepts, but a few explanatory sentences could be tightened further, so it sits just below the lean anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready `npx @tanstack/cli create ...` commands with concrete flags, plus Wrong/Correct pairs covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The body is organized as patterns and mistakes rather than a sequenced workflow, and there is no explicit validation/verification checkpoint after generation; checkpoints are missing or only implicit. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear overview structure (Setup, Core Patterns, Common Mistakes, References) points to four real one-level-deep reference files, all of which exist in references/, with well-signaled navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |