Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, executable reference with complete code and well-signaled sections, and it avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows. The only mild gap is the absence of an explicit validation checkpoint, which is not strictly required for read-only aggregation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence; every prose block conveys version-specific v9 API behavior (caching, maxDepth, merge semantics) rather than generic concepts Claude already knows, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | All code blocks are complete and executable with imports, and the examples cover the common cases (grand/filtered/child totals, multiple keyed aggregations, custom functions, manual values), matching the fully-executable anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Setup -> Core Patterns -> Common Mistakes -> API Discovery flow is clear with Wrong/Correct guardrails, but it is a patterns catalog rather than a checkpointed multi-step workflow; aggregation is read-only so the destructive-validation cap does not apply, fitting the clear-sequence-with-minor-gaps anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so scoring rests on the single-file structure; the body is well-sectioned and the API Discovery section appropriately points to external library paths rather than inlining bulk reference material, matching the good-structure anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |