CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

aggregation

Aggregate TanStack Table columns independently of grouping, including grand totals, caller-selected row totals, multiple keyed aggregations, custom context-based definitions, grouped merges, manual values, and worker constraints.

64

Quality

76%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./packages/table-core/skills/aggregation/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a tight, executable reference with complete code and well-signaled sections, and it avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows. The only mild gap is the absence of an explicit validation checkpoint, which is not strictly required for read-only aggregation.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence; every prose block conveys version-specific v9 API behavior (caching, maxDepth, merge semantics) rather than generic concepts Claude already knows, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor.

5 / 5

Actionability

All code blocks are complete and executable with imports, and the examples cover the common cases (grand/filtered/child totals, multiple keyed aggregations, custom functions, manual values), matching the fully-executable anchor.

5 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The Setup -> Core Patterns -> Common Mistakes -> API Discovery flow is clear with Wrong/Correct guardrails, but it is a patterns catalog rather than a checkpointed multi-step workflow; aggregation is read-only so the destructive-validation cap does not apply, fitting the clear-sequence-with-minor-gaps anchor.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist, so scoring rests on the single-file structure; the body is well-sectioned and the API Discovery section appropriately points to external library paths rather than inlining bulk reference material, matching the good-structure anchor.

4 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is highly specific and clearly distinct, but it omits any explicit "when to use" trigger guidance and leans on technical jargon over natural user phrasing. Adding a Use-when clause would lift the two lowest dimensions.

Suggestions

Append an explicit trigger clause such as "Use when aggregating TanStack Table columns for totals or subtotals, independent of grouping" to satisfy the completeness "when" requirement.

Add natural synonyms users actually say (e.g. "sums", "averages", "subtotals", "rollups") alongside the technical jargon to improve trigger-term coverage.

Mention the library trigger ("@tanstack/table-core" / "TanStack Table") so the skill surfaces when users reference the library by name.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description enumerates seven concrete actions ("grand totals, caller-selected row totals, multiple keyed aggregations, custom context-based definitions, grouped merges, manual values, and worker constraints"), matching the comprehensive-coverage anchor.

5 / 5

Completeness

It clearly states what the skill does but provides no "Use when..." or equivalent trigger guidance, so per the missing-trigger cap completeness cannot exceed 3.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms like "aggregate" and "totals" appear, but the bulk is technical jargon ("keyed aggregations", "context-based definitions", "worker constraints") with no common synonyms or file/library trigger phrases, fitting the some-keywords-but-missing-variations anchor.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It carves out a specific TanStack Table aggregation niche ("independently of grouping") with low conflict risk, but the sibling grouping skill is a close neighbor, matching the mostly-distinct-with-minor-overlap anchor.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Validation

87%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation14 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

14

/

16

Passed

Repository
TanStack/table
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.