Content
90%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplar of lean, executable, library-specific guidance that assumes competence and avoids restating basics; its only soft spots are the absence of an explicit verification checkpoint for aggregation results and a slightly informal API-discovery pointer.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and dense with API specifics (caching behavior, maxDepth semantics, structured-clone constraints); it assumes Claude's competence and every line earns its place with no padding or restated basics. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Code blocks are copy-paste ready and cover the common cases (setup, grand/selected totals, multiple aggregations, custom definitions, manual values), with specific typed signatures and concrete option objects rather than pseudocode. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Patterns are clearly organized into setup, core patterns, and common mistakes with explicit wrong/correct contrasts; this is not a destructive batch workflow, so it does not require validate-fix-retry loops, though an explicit verification/check step for aggregation output would push it to 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with an inline API Discovery pointer to node_modules paths and guide docs; no bundle files exist, and the body is short enough that inlining is appropriate, but the discovery pointer is prose rather than a clearly signaled reference link. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |