Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is lean, actionable, and well-structured, with executable setup code and concrete mistake guidance; the only minor gap is representing the plugin mount as code rather than prose.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — a complete Setup example, terse Wrong/Correct mistake entries, and a one-line API Discovery pointer — with only minor instances (the prose 'Hooks and Components' paragraph) that could be tightened. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Setup provides a copy-paste-ready Vue SFC example and Common Mistakes give concrete Wrong/Correct guidance; the only gap is the plugin mount described in prose ('Mount the Vue TanStackDevtools host once with tableDevtoolsPlugin({})') rather than as executable code. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The registration workflow is unambiguous (build the table, call useTanStackTableDevtools, mount the plugin once) and Common Mistakes supply guardrails; this is not a destructive/batch operation so the missing validate-fix-retry loop does not cap the score, though sequencing emphasis is slightly implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files are present (references/scripts/assets absent) and the body is a short, well-organized set of sections (Setup, Hooks and Components, Common Mistakes, API Discovery), matching the simple-skill exception that well-organized sections earn a 5 without external references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |