Content
96%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable and concise, with executable examples and a clear Wrong/Correct mistake checklist. Progressive disclosure is good but lacks the one-level-deep reference-file structure that would raise it further.
Suggestions
Consider extracting the API Discovery details (which .d.ts files to inspect and what to look for) into a short reference file so the main body stays a pure overview.
Add a brief 'Prerequisites' note clarifying that the cited @tanstack/table-core#core and table-features skills must be loaded first, so the sequencing is explicit.
Optionally add a quick verification step (e.g., 'Confirm the table re-renders when data ref changes') to make the creation workflow's checkpoint explicit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and technical — complete SFC, a focused feature snippet, and a tight Wrong/Correct mistake format — assuming Claude's competence with no padding about what Vue or tables are. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | All examples are fully executable: a runnable <script setup> SFC, real imports in the tableFeatures snippet, and concrete Wrong/Correct diffs that cover the common v9 mistakes. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a single-purpose creation skill, the single action is unambiguous and the Common Mistakes section functions as a validation checklist; no destructive or batch operation triggers the cap-3 requirement. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized with clear headers and a one-level-deep pointer to node_modules type definitions, but there is no separate-file reference split of the kind that characterizes a 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |