Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, executable workflow skill: concrete commands and templates throughout, a rigorously gated three-phase process with both visual and technical validation, and a clean script bundle. The main gap is conciseness and some inline reference content that could be externalized.
Suggestions
Tighten the rationale prose under '强制审批协议' and '色彩规则' to directive statements; the two-gate justification and color-emotion mappings add tokens without adding executable value.
Consider moving the full Seedream and aigc-video-gen prompt templates plus the QA checklists into a references/ file (e.g. PROMPT-TEMPLATES.md, QA.md) and signaling them one level deep, which would lift progressive_disclosure to a clean 5.
Trim the duplicated model-fallback chain (it appears in both the description and Gate 3) to a single authoritative statement in the body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient—every phase leads with executable commands, JSON schemas, or prompt templates and avoids explaining what Claude already knows. Not a 5 because some rationale prose (e.g. the two-gate justification, color-rule exposition) could be tightened further. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable throughout—copy-paste ffmpeg tile/crop/audio-strip commands, aigc-video-gen i2v invocations with all flags, a gen-jobs.json schema, and complete Seedream/video prompt templates covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear three-gate sequence with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops: Gate 1/2 user confirmation, 静帧 QA checklist, 视频 QA checklist, and a mandatory video-review technical gate (verdict=pass required) with regenerate-on-fail handling. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into phased sections with a real one-level-deep script bundle (scripts/run_gate3.py, scripts/check_setup.sh) referenced and listed. Not a 5 because substantial reference-style content (color rules, QA checklists, prompt templates) lives inline rather than split into separate reference files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |