Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, highly executable skill document: complete command surface with defaults and semantics, a clearly sequenced evaluation loop with validation gates and error-recovery rules, and a clean one-level-deep reference split. The main cost is token efficiency — key safety rules and scheduled-review details are repeated verbatim across sections, and some reference-file content leaks back into the main file.
Suggestions
State the '评估只产出建议、DNA 更新须用户逐条确认' and '先排混杂再归因' rules once (in the 铁律 block) and reference them elsewhere by name instead of repeating them in 职责边界, 归因原则, and 定时取数与复盘.
Trim the '最终回复正文即完整报告' delivery rules and the ≥5 条/≥3 天 threshold definitions from the body — both already live in references/scheduled-review.md — keeping only the pointer.
Move the numbered main-agent Automation enable/adjust/disable steps (items 1-5) into the reference or a short checklist, since they are procedural detail rather than overview content.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly dense and efficient with no explanation of known concepts, but core rules are repeated nearly verbatim multiple times — '评估只产出建议 / DNA 更新须用户确认' appears in the 四条评估铁律, the 职责边界 section, and the 定时取数与复盘 section, and '先排混杂再归因' likewise. The 定时取数 governance section also restates content from the reference file. Fits the 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' anchor; not a 2 since there is no padding or over-explanation. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Every operation has a copy-paste-ready command with placeholder arguments and defaults — 'content-calibrator eval --platform <platform> --check', '--dna-id <dna-id> --force', '--mark-evaluated --ids 3,4,5' — plus precise baseline semantics ('此前最多 N 篇均值，此前 <3 篇 → baseline_insufficient'), an enumerated 5-part report structure, and a concrete 4-step attribution procedure. Specific examples cover the common cases with no meaningful gaps. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 核心闭环 gives a clear sequence (取数 → 阈值检查 --check → 聚合+归因 → 报告 → 用户逐条确认 → style-dna 更新) with explicit validation checkpoints: the --check threshold gate, baseline_insufficient downgrade to absolute-only observation, and the mandatory post-report '--mark-evaluated' to prevent duplicate evaluation. Error-recovery feedback is specified ('技术故障记录后继续其他平台', '认证失效不自动登录'), and the batch DNA-update operation is guarded by mandatory per-item user confirmation — so the batch-operation cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | One clearly signaled, real, one-level-deep reference ('参考文件：[定时取数与 DNA 复盘](references/scheduled-review.md)') verified to exist and to not nest further references, with a deliberate split: SKILL.md holds enable/adjust/disable governance while the reference holds per-run execution detail. Not a 5 because some reference content (the '最终回复正文即完整报告' delivery rules and threshold definitions) is duplicated inline in the body rather than left solely in the reference. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |