Conciseness

The body is efficient and assumes competence — it jumps straight into the command signature, behavior rules, and message format without explaining what a database or an invite is — with only minor trimming possible in the duplicated parameter explanations, matching the "efficient; minor instances of over-explanation" anchor rather than the lean score-5.

Actionability

It provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready command invocations with exact flags ("--peer", "--user-id-external", "--force"), the concrete control-message format "/invite//<user_external_id>//风暴眼（wiseflow情报小站）", and clear return/exit-code conventions ("ALREADY_INVITED", non-zero exit), covering the common cases exactly as the score-5 anchor describes.

Workflow Clarity

The workflow has a clear sequence with validation checkpoints — block non-free users unless --force, update business_status conditionally, emit the control message, and report ALREADY_INVITED with non-zero exit — but the recovery loop is implicit rather than an explicit validate-fix-retry checklist, so it sits at the score-4 "clear sequence with most checkpoints; minor validation gaps" rather than 5.

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-organized into focused sections (用途, 客户标识提取规则, 行为规则, business_status 更新规则, 邀请消息格式, 返回约定) with the executable logic appropriately delegated to the bundled scripts/invite.sh; this is good structure with only minor organization gaps (e.g. the duplicate group-name section), matching score-4 rather than the fully one-level-deep-referenced score-5.

Specificity

It lists several concrete actions — "Invite a qualified customer into the experience group", "sent as an awada control message", "customer status is updated to exp_invited to prevent duplicate invitations" — with only minor gaps in coverage, matching the "lists several specific actions; minor gaps" anchor rather than the vague score-3 single-action anchor.

Completeness

The "what" is clear (invite into the experience group via awada control message, update status to exp_invited), but the "when" is only weakly implied ("when they want to understand the product form further after seeing demo materials") with no explicit "Use when..." trigger guidance, which per the judging guidelines caps completeness at 3.

Trigger Term Quality

It contains some relevant keywords ("experience group", "demo", "invite", "customer status") but lacks the natural conversational trigger phrases and synonyms a user would say, and has no "Use when..." trigger clause, fitting "some relevant keywords but missing common variations" rather than the comprehensive score-4 anchor.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is fairly specific — awada control-message invites into a named experience group with exp_invited status tracking — so it is mostly distinct with only minor overlap risk against other customer-status skills, matching the score-4 "mostly distinct; minor overlap risk" anchor rather than the broad score-3.