Conciseness

The body is table-driven routing with zero padding: every line allocates a responsibility, a tool, a data location, or a boundary (e.g. "快手普通互动、私信与直播写操作未实现；微博互动写操作未实现"). No concept explanations to trim, matching the lean top anchor.

Actionability

Concrete, executable guidance throughout: named tools per platform, exact data paths (db/bd_record.db, bd/live/), session rules (douyin-login 独立 API 会话；小红书复用 xhs-hunter PC 会话，不混用 Creator 登录), and dedup/recording rules. Step-level execution detail is delegated to the workflow and tool files, leaving minor gaps — matching the 4 anchor.

Workflow Clarity

A clear routing decision rule ("找客户和筛选潜客按本包 Lead Hunting 执行；已有目标时直接核对语境、授权和实际能力") plus explicit validation checkpoints for risky write ops ("每次写操作核对真实目标和既有授权；预览后仅执行已授权动作…结果不明时先核实，不自动重发或换通道补发"). The batch-outreach validation cap at 3 does not apply since validation is present; detailed multi-step sequences live in the workflow files, so this fits 4 rather than 5.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is an overview with clearly signaled one-level-deep references: three workflow links in the routing table, twelve tool SKILL.md links, and [互动能力表](references/interaction-capabilities.md), which exists and matches its pointer. Minor gaps keep it at 4: the workflows/ and tools/ paths are not present in the provided bundle, and the tool table partially duplicates capability detail already in the references file.

Specificity

The description lists many concrete actions — "潜客探索筛选、评论回复、私信、邮件、点赞收藏关注、直播间互动、客户触达与联络记录" — giving comprehensive coverage of the skill's capabilities, matching the top anchor. It uses third-person phrasing, so no voice penalty applies.

Completeness

The "what" is clear and concrete, but there is no explicit "Use when…" or equivalent trigger clause; the "when" is only weakly implied via routing-out statements (商业情报…走 expert-osbi；融资推进走 expert-ir). Per the rubric guideline, a missing explicit trigger clause caps completeness at 3.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural domain keywords are present (潜客筛选, 评论回复, 私信, 点赞收藏关注, 直播间互动, 客户触达), but platform names (抖音/小红书/TikTok/X) and common synonyms (找客户/拓客/获客) that users would naturally say appear only in the body, not the description. This is good coverage with a few natural terms missing, matching the 4 anchor rather than 5.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche (BD outreach) is clear with explicit deferrals to expert-osbi and expert-ir, reducing conflict with those skills. However, it claims 邮件 while the body routes email execution to the public email-ops skill, creating minor overlap risk with a closely related skill — matching the 4 anchor rather than 5.