Content
72%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable reference for a SQLite intel-collection tool with well-organized sections and implementation correctly delegated to wrapper scripts, but its workflow lacks an explicit validation/verification feedback loop.
Suggestions
Add a verification step after record-content (e.g., re-run check-content or read back the returned id) to form a validate→retry feedback loop for the DB workflow.
Provide one literal worked example with real values for record-content to close the actionability gap.
De-duplicate the database path between the intro and the '数据库位置' section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — schema table, executable commands, and usage rules with no concept-explanation padding — with only minor redundancy (the db path is restated in its own section), fitting 'efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed.' | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are concrete and executable with every flag and JSON return format documented (e.g., 'info-record record-content --source … --content …'), but they use templated placeholders with no literal worked example, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 3-step sequence with a dedup gate ('先用 check-content … 已记录则跳过') is present, but as a database-operation skill it lacks a validate/verify-retry feedback loop, capping workflow clarity at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short, well-sectioned single-purpose skill whose implementation lives in real scripts (check-content.sh, record-content.sh, query-today.sh) appropriately hidden behind the one-level 'info-record' PATH wrapper, with no nested references — meeting the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |